4.4 Article

Comparison of standardised dietary folate intake across ten countries participating in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 108, Issue 3, Pages 552-569

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114511005733

Keywords

Dietary folate intake; 24 h Dietary recall; European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition; EPIC-Soft (R); Europe

Funding

  1. World Cancer Research Fund [2008/51]
  2. 'Europe Against Cancer' Programme of the European Commission
  3. Public Health and Consumer Protection Directorate
  4. Ligue contre le Cancer (France)
  5. Societe 3M (France)
  6. Mutuelle Generale de l'Education Nationale
  7. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM)
  8. Institut Gustave Roussy
  9. German Cancer Aid
  10. German Cancer Research Centre
  11. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
  12. Danish Cancer Society
  13. Health Research Fund of the Spanish Ministry of Health
  14. Spanish Regional Governments of Andalucia
  15. Catalan Institute of Oncology
  16. ISCIII RETIC, Spain [RD06/0020]
  17. Cancer Research UK
  18. Medical Research Council, UK
  19. Stavros Niarchos Foundation
  20. Hellenic Health Foundation (Greece)
  21. Italian Association for Research on Cancer
  22. Italian National Research Council, Regione Sicilia (Sicilian government)
  23. Associazione Iblea per la Ricerca Epidemiologica - ONLUS (Hyblean association for epidemiological research, NPO)
  24. Dutch Ministry of Public Health, Welfare and Sports
  25. Dutch Prevention Funds
  26. LK Research Funds
  27. Dutch ZON (Zorg Onderzoek Nederland)
  28. World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF)
  29. Swedish Cancer Society
  30. Swedish Research Council
  31. Regional Government of Skane
  32. County Council of Vasterbotten, Sweden
  33. Norwegian Cancer Society
  34. Norwegian Research Council
  35. Norwegian Foundation for Health and Rehabilitation
  36. Cancer Research UK [14136] Funding Source: researchfish
  37. Medical Research Council [G0801056B, G0401527, G1000143] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Folate plays an important role in the synthesis and methylation of DNA as a cofactor in one-carbon metabolism. Inadequate folate intake has been linked to adverse health events. However, comparable information on dietary folate intake across European countries has never been reported. The objective of the present study was to describe the dietary folate intake and its food sources in ten countries in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. A cross-sectional analysis was conducted in 36 034 participants (aged 35-74 years) who completed a single 24 h dietary recall using a computerised interview software program, EPIC-Soft (R) (International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon). Dietary folate intake was estimated using the standardised EPIC Nutrient DataBase, adjusted for age, energy intake, weight and height and weighted by season and day of recall. Adjusted mean dietary folate intake in most centres ranged from 250 to 350 mu g/d in men and 200 to 300 mu g/d in women. Folate intake tended to be lower among current smokers and heavier alcohol drinkers and to increase with educational level, especially in women. Supplement users (any types) were likely to report higher dietary folate intake in most centres. Vegetables, cereals and fruits, nuts and seeds were the main contributors to folate intake. Nonetheless, the type and pattern of consumption of these main food items varied across the centres. These first comparisons of standardised dietary folate intakes across different European populations show moderate regional differences (except the UK health conscious group), and variation by sex, educational level, smoking and alcohol-drinking status, and supplement use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available