4.4 Article

The impact of salt, fat and sugar levels on toddler food intake

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages 645-653

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114510003752

Keywords

Children; Food intake; Salt; Fat; Sugar; BMI

Funding

  1. Nutrition, Chemical Food Safety and Consumer Behaviour Division of INRA (French National Institute for Agronomical Research)
  2. Regional Council of Burgundy
  3. Dijon University Hospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding the early determinants of food intake, in particular the role of food sensory quality, is a necessary step to improve the prevention of unhealthy food habits. However, the extent to which food intake varies according to salt, fat and sugar content is imperfectly known. The present study aimed at evaluating whether toddler food intake varied during lunches or snacks in which salt, fat or sugar contents had been modified in common foods. Seventy-four children (30 (SE 0.5) months old) participated in the study in their usual day-care centres. Every other week, they were served lunches composed, among other items, of green beans and pasta with varying salt (0, 0.6 and 1.2% added salt) or fat (0, 2.5 and 5% added butter) levels and afternoon snacks composed of fruit puree varying in sugar level (0, 5 and 10% added sugar). During each meal, children could eat as much as they wanted from the target foods. Each food was weighed before and after the meal. Salt level had a positive impact on the intake of the target foods. On the contrary, no impact of added fat or added sugar levels was observed. This implies that fat and sugar addition could be avoided in foods for children without having an impact on palatability, allowing the energy density of children's diet to be limited. Salt addition should be limited, but its suppression in vegetables, whose intake is to be promoted, should be considered cautiously.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available