4.4 Article

Quantitative differences in intestinal Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in obese Indian children

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 103, Issue 3, Pages 335-338

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114509992182

Keywords

Microbiota; Faecalibacterium; Obesity; Colon; Butyrate-producing bacteria

Funding

  1. Indian Council of Medical Research
  2. Department of Science and Technology, Government of India [LSI-141/2002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gut bacteria contribute to energy conservation in man through their ability to ferment Unabsorbed carbohydrate. The present study examined the composition of predominant faecal microbiota in obese and non-obese children. The participants (n 28) aged 11-14 years provided fresh faecal samples and completed a dietary survey consisting of 24 h diet recall and a FFQ of commonly used foods taken over the previous 3 months. Faecal bacteria were quantitated by real-time PCR using primers targeted at 16S rDNA. Of the participants, fifteen (seven female) were obese, with median BMI-for-age at the 99th percentile (range 97 to > 99) while thirteen participants (seven female) were normal weight, with median BMI-for age being at the 50th percentile (range 1-85). Consumption of energy, carbohydrates, fat and protein was not significantly different between the obese and non-obese participants. There was no significant difference between the two groups in faecal levels of Bacteroides-Prevotella. Bifidobacterium species, Lactobacillus acidophilus group or Eubacterium rectale. Levels of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, were significantly higher in obese children than in non-obese participants (P=0.0253). We concluded that the finding of increased numbers off. prausnitzii in the faeces of obese children in south India adds to the growing information on alterations in faecal microbiota in obesity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available