4.4 Article

Snacking patterns among adolescents: a comparison of type, frequency and portion size between Britain in 1997 and Northern Ireland in 2005

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 101, Issue 1, Pages 122-131

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114508994769

Keywords

Snacking; Portion size; Energy intake; Adolescents

Funding

  1. Food Standards Agency, UK

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite the potential link between snack food intake and obesity and the reportedly high prevalence of snacking am ng snack food patterns (types of foods consumed, frequency and portion size) have not been extensively examined. This study examines these issues using data on the snacking patterns of adolescents aged 13-16 years who took part in the 1997 National Diet and Nutrition Survey (NDNS) and that from a Northern Irish (NI) cohort of adolescents collected 8 years later, in 2005. Overall energy intake was significantly higher in the NI adolescents in 2005 compared with the NDNS adolescents in 1997 (P<0.01). Consequently, energy intake from snacks was significantly higher in the NI cohort (P<0.01) and a trend for a higher % energy intake from snacks compared with the NDNS group was observed (median 32.5 % v. 29.8 %, respectively). Sugar-sweetened carbonated and soft drinks remained the most popular choice of snack over this 8-year periods however, both the portion size consumed and frequency of consumption were significantly higher among the adolescents in 2005 compared with those in 1997 (P=0.022 and P=0.014, respectively). Despite the lower popularity, and correspondingly lower frequency of milks and beverages, the portion size of both food groups was significantly higher among the adolescents in 2005 compared with those in 1997 (P<0.001 and P=0.007, respectively). These findings may provide scope for policy interventions to place particular emphasis on reducing typical portion sizes consumed of popular snack choices, in particular high-energy carbonated and soft drinks, among UK adolescents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available