4.4 Article

Malnutrition prevalence in The Netherlands: results of the Annual Dutch National Prevalence Measurement of Care Problems

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 101, Issue 3, Pages 417-423

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114508998317

Keywords

Malnutrition; Prevalence; Factors; Hospital; Nursing home; Home care

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to provide data oil malnutrition prevalence in hospitals, nursing homes and home-care organisations in The Netherlands in a nationally representative sample, and to assess the factors such as age, sex, time since admission, ward type and disease for identifying patients at high risk of malnutrition, A cross sectional, multi-centre design with a standardised questionnaire was used to measure the prevalence of trial nutrition. Nutritional status was assessed by BMI, undesired weight loss and nutritional intake. In this study, 12 883 patients were included. The prevalence of malnutrition was the highest in hospitals (23.9 %), followed by home-care organisations (21.7 %) and nursing homes (19.2 %). Logistic regression analysis revealed no association with age, time since admission and ward type. Being female was associated with malnutrition only in nursing homes. Blood diseases, gastrointestinal tract diseases, infection, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia and cancer were the factors associated with malnutrition in hospitals. Dementia was associated with malnutrition in nursing home,, while gastrointestinal tract diseases, diabetes mellitus and cancer were the associated factors in home care. This study shows that malnutrition is still a substantial problem in hospitals, nursing homes and home care in The Netherlands. Malnutrition is a problem for more than one in five patients. Despite growing attention to the problem, more continued alertness is required.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available