4.4 Article

The effects of age, birth cohort and survey period on leisure-time physical activity by Australian adults: 1990-2005

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 101, Issue 4, Pages 609-617

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114508019879

Keywords

Age-period-cohort analysis; Leisure-time physical activity; Energy expenditure

Funding

  1. NSW Centre for Overweight and Obesity
  2. Medical Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The prevalence of obesity continues to rise with many factors contributing to energy imbalance. Leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) has been proposed as one solution to counteract increasing energy intakes. The present study determined whether age, birth cohort and period of survey had independent effects on time, volume and energy expended in LTPA by Australian adults from 1990 to 2005. Adults were categorised into twelve age groups (5-year intervals from 20-24 years to >75 years), four survey periods (1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005) and fifteen birth cohorts (5-year intervals from pre-1916 to 1985). Time spent in three categories of LTPA was determined and metabolic equivalent (MET) values of 3.3, 4.0 and 8.0 were assigned for walking, moderate and vigorous activities, respectively, to calculate daily volume (MET minutes). Energy expended in LTPA was calculated using estimated BMR (from self-reported weight and published formulae), multiplied by the MET value. Regression models were fitted to the data. Age and period had independent effects oil duration, volume and energy expenditure of LTPA for both males (P<0.01) and females (P<0.01), while birth cohort had independent effects for males only such that all three LTPA factors declined with recency of birth cohort (P<0.01). This indicates that more recent birth cohorts of males may need to be targeted to increase LTPA, but as duration, volume and energy expended in leisure time have been declining since 1990, both the sexes may benefit from the promotion of increased LTPA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available