4.5 Article

Scenario-Based Proactive Robust Optimization for Critical-Chain Project Scheduling

Journal

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001003

Keywords

Scheduling; Duration; Robustness; Scenario; Critical-chain project management (CCPM); Cost and schedule

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [70802045]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The robustness of construction project schedules is a key factor that determines the capability of the schedules in offsetting the negative impact of uncertainties, which are the primary causes of project delays. This paper proposes a scenario-based proactive robustness optimization (SBPRO) method, which aims to improve the robustness of construction project schedules that are developed using the critical-chain project management (CCPM) method. The SBPRO method integrates scenarios that represent all possible situations that may happen during project implementation. Therefore, schedules are less sensitive to variations of situations than schedules developed using the traditional CCPM-based scheduling method. Moreover, the SBPRO method is based on a dual-objective function and optimizes schedules by balancing a trade-off between two objectives, namely, reducing the length of planned schedules and mitigating the uncertainties in schedule execution. The SBPRO method was validated in three case studies. The results showed that the SBPRO method outperformed the traditional CCPM-based scheduling method by generating schedules that could ensure higher probabilities of on-time project completion. The results also demonstrated that the SBPRO method could serve to promote the understanding and acceptance among project teams of the trade-off between project duration and schedule robustness when managing complex construction projects. (C) 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available