4.4 Article

Modeling ligand recognition at the P2Y12 receptor in light of X-ray structural information

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN
Volume 29, Issue 8, Pages 737-756

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10822-015-9858-z

Keywords

G protein-coupled receptors; Purines; Molecular modeling; Nucleotides; Structure-activity relationship; X-ray crystallographic structures

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (Intramural Research Program of NIDDK) [R01HL077707]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The G protein-coupled P2Y(12) receptor (P2Y(12)R) is an important antithrombotic target and of great interest for pharmaceutical discovery. Its recently solved, highly divergent crystallographic structures in complex either with nucleotides (full or partial agonist) or with a nonnucleotide antagonist raise the question of which structure is more useful to understand ligand recognition. Therefore, we performed extensive molecular modeling studies based on these structures and mutagenesis, to predict the binding modes of major classes of P2Y(12)R ligands previously reported. Various nucleotide derivatives docked readily to the agonist-bound P2Y(12)R, but uncharged nucleotide-like antagonist ticagrelor required a hybrid receptor resembling the agonist-bound P2Y(12)R except for the top portion of TM6. Supervised molecular dynamics (SuMD) of ticagrelor binding indicated interactions with the extracellular regions of P2Y(12)R, defining possible meta-binding sites. Ureas, sulfonylureas, sulfonamides, anthraquinones and glutamic acid piperazines docked readily to the antagonist-bound P2Y(12)R. Docking dinucleotides at both agonist- and antagonist-bound structures suggested interactions with two P2Y(12)R pockets. Thus, our structure-based approach consistently rationalized the main structure-activity relationships within each ligand class, giving useful information for designing improved ligands.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available