4.6 Article

Everolimus for patients with mantle cell lymphoma refractory to or intolerant of bortezomib: multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 165, Issue 4, Pages 510-518

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.12780

Keywords

mantle cell lymphoma; bortezomib; mammalian target of rapamycin; everolimus; relapsed/refractory disease

Categories

Funding

  1. Novartis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The multicentre, open-label, two-stage, single-arm, phase 2, PILLAR (PIvotaL Lymphoma triAls of RAD001)-1 study (NCT00702052) assessed the efficacy and safety of everolimus 10mg/d in adults with confirmed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) refractory to or intolerant of bortezomib who received >= 1 other antineoplastic agent, either separately or in combination with bortezomib. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) per investigator review according to the response criteria for malignant lymphoma. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Fifty-eight patients were enrolled from August 2008-January 2011. Five partial responses were observed (ORR 8 center dot 6%; 90% confidence interval [CI] 3 center dot 5-17 center dot 3%); the study did not meet the prespecified objective of >= 8 objective responses among 57 patients. Median PFS and OS were 4 center dot 4months (95% CI 3 center dot 5-6 center dot 1) and 16 center dot 9months (95% CI 14 center dot 4-29 center dot 9), respectively. Grade 3/4 non-haematological toxicities occurred in 70 center dot 7% of patients. Based on laboratory values, grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, neutropenia and anaemia occurred in 13 center dot 8%, 13 center dot 8% and 8 center dot 6% of patients, respectively. Everolimus demonstrated modest activity and acceptable tolerability in heavily pretreated patients with MCL refractory to or intolerant of bortezomib. Future studies evaluating everolimus in a less refractory population or in combination with other targeted therapies in refractory MCL are warranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available