4.6 Article

CEBPA double-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia harbours concomitant molecular mutations in 76•8% of cases with TET2 and GATA2 alterations impacting prognosis

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 161, Issue 5, Pages 649-658

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.12297

Keywords

CEBPA double mutated; concomitant mutations; survival analysis; serial analyses; gene expression array

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) with CEBPA mutations is listed as a provisional entity in the current World Health Organization classification. A difference in clinical outcome between single- (sm) and double-mutated (dm) cases has been reported, whereupon CEBPAdm cases were shown to be associated with better overall survival (OS). The occurrence and prognostic impact of concomitant molecular mutations in addition to CEBPAdm has not been assessed until now with exception of GATA2 mutations. Here, we investigated a cohort of 95 AML CEBPAdm cases for concomitant mutations. TET2 was found to be most frequently mutated (34 center dot 0%) gene, followed by GATA2 (21 center dot 0%), WT1 (13 center dot 7%), DNMT3A (9 center dot 6%), ASXL1 (9 center dot 5%), NRAS (8 center dot 4%), KRAS (3 center dot 2%), IDH1/2 (6 center dot 3%), FLT3-internal tandem duplication (6 center dot 3%), FLT3-tyrosine kinase domain (2 center dot 1%), NPM1 (2 center dot 1%), and RUNX1 (1/94). Patients harbouring additional mutations in the TET2 gene showed significantly worse OS than TET2 wild-type cases (P=0 center dot 035), whereas GATA2-mutated patients showed improved OS (P=0 center dot 032). Serial analyses were performed for 39 CEBPAdm cases with concomitant mutations. Here, we observed that CEBPA mutations present the primary pathogenetic event in the majority of cases (76 center dot 9%). Further, a distinct gene expression profile (GEP) was confirmed for CEBPAdm versus CEBPAsm or CEBPA wild-type cases while no significant changes in GEP were observed related to additional mutations within the CEBPAdm AML.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available