4.6 Article

Thrombotic risk in patients with immune thrombocytopenia and its association with antiphospholipid antibodies

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 161, Issue 5, Pages 706-714

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.12318

Keywords

thrombocytopenia; thrombosis; antiphospholipid antibody

Categories

Funding

  1. Health Fellowship Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) paradoxically have an increased risk of thrombosis. The presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) has been observed in a substantial proportion of ITP patients, but its clinical significance remains to be established. This study retrospectively investigated the prevalence and clinical significance of aPL in ITP patients and assessed the risk factors for thrombosis. One hundred and sixty-five subjects with ITP were included in the study and followed for a mean period of 63 center dot 4months. Sixty-nine (41 center dot 6%) patients were positive for aPL at diagnosis, and their clinical characteristics and course of ITP were not different from those of aPL-negative patients. Twenty-one (12 center dot 7%) patients developed a thrombotic event during follow-up and the cumulative incidence rate ratio of aPL-positive to aPL-negative patients for thromboembolism was 3 center dot 15 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1 center dot 218 center dot 17] after adjusting for confounding factors. Lupus anticoagulant and hypertension were identified by Cox regression analysis as independent risk factors for thrombosis [hazard ratio (HR) 4 center dot 1, 95% CI 1 center dot 411 center dot 9, P=0 center dot 009 and HR 5 center dot 6, 95% CI 1 center dot 915 center dot 8, P=0 center dot 001, respectively]. Our results showed that a substantial proportion of ITP patients were aPL-positive, and that lupus anticoagulant and hypertension were independent risk factors for thrombosis. Detection of aPL can provide useful information for identifying patients at high-risk for developing thrombosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available