4.6 Article

Identification of emerging FLT3 ITD-positive clones during clinical remission and kinetics of disease relapse in acute myeloid leukaemia with mutated nucleophosmin

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 161, Issue 4, Pages 533-540

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.12288

Keywords

FLT3 ITD; patient-specific RQ-PCR; NPM1; AML; relapse

Categories

Funding

  1. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro
  2. Associazione Italiana contro le Leucemie, Linfomi e Mieloma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

FLT3 internal tandem duplication (ITD) mutations are frequently detected at diagnosis in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukaemia (CN-AML) and predict unfavourable outcome. FLT3 ITD is an unstable aberration and may be lost or acquired at relapse. Recent whole genome sequencing studies have suggested that FLT3 ITD+ve AML relapse may evolve from small subclones undetectable at diagnosis by routine polymerase chain reaction (PCR). We developed a patient-specific real-time quantitative-PCR (RQ-PCR) to implement FLT3 ITD detection in six AML patients whose blasts carried wild-type FLT3 at diagnosis and who relapsed with FLT3 ITD by routine PCR. Patient-specific forward primers were designed after cloning and sequencing the FLT3 ITD in each case. The assay allowed retrospective detection of FLT3 ITD in diagnostic samples of 4/6 cases and to establish the kinetics of clonal evolution preceding relapse. After conventional chemotherapy, all patients had early relapse despite having been classified as NPM1+ve/FLT3 ITDve at presentation, with shorter remissions being observed in four patients re-classified as FLT3 ITD+ve by the new assay. Notably, FLT3 ITD clone became detectable by conventional PCR in three patients tested during remission after initial treatment. Our data underscore the need of identifying low FLT3ITD levels, which are probably associated with relapse in otherwise good prognosis CN-AML.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available