4.6 Article

A phase II study of vorinostat (MK-0683) in patients with polycythaemia vera and essential thrombocythaemia

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 162, Issue 4, Pages 498-508

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.12416

Keywords

essential thrombocythaemia; polycythaemia vera; phase II study; histone deacetylase inhibition; vorinostat

Categories

Funding

  1. MPD Voice in the UK
  2. Danish Cancer Society
  3. MPD-voice
  4. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (MSD), Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Inhibition of histone deacetylases may be an important target in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms. This investigator-initiated, non-randomized, open-label phase II multi-centre study included 63 patients (19 essential thrombocythaemia, 44 polycythaemia vera) from 15 centres. The primary objective was to evaluate if vorinostat was followed by a decline in clonal myeloproliferation as defined by European Leukaemia Net. Thirty patients (48%) completed the intervention period (24 weeks of therapy). An intention-to-treat response rate of 35% was identified. Pruritus was resolved [19% to 0% (P=0.06)] and the prevalence of splenomegaly was lowered from 50% to 27% (P=0.03). Sixty-five per cent of the patients experienced a decrease in JAK2 V617F allele burden (P=0.006). Thirty-three patients (52% of patients) discontinued study drug before end of intervention due to adverse events (28 patients) or lack of response (5 patients). In conclusion, vorinostat showed effectiveness by normalizing elevated leucocyte and platelet counts, resolving pruritus and significantly reducing splenomegaly. However, vorinostat was associated with significant side effects resulting in a high discontinuation rate. A lower dose of vorinostat in combination with conventional and/or novel targeted therapies may be warranted in future studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available