4.6 Article

Platelet size for distinguishing between inherited thrombocytopenias and immune thrombocytopenia: a multicentric, real life study

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 162, Issue 1, Pages 112-119

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.12349

Keywords

inherited thrombocytopenias; immune thrombocytopenia; platelet volume; platelet diameter; platelet size

Categories

Funding

  1. Telethon Foundation [GGP10089]
  2. Cariplo Foundation [2012-0529]
  3. IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy [Ricerca Corrente 08044500/06]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The most frequent forms of inherited thrombocytopenia (IT) are characterized by platelet size abnormalities and it has been suggested that this parameter is useful for their differentiation from immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Recently, a monocentric study identified cut-off values for mean platelet volume (MPV) and mean platelet diameter (MPD) with good diagnostic accuracy in this respect. To validate these cut-off values in a different and larger case series of patients, we enrolled 130 subjects with ITP and 113 with IT in six different centres. The platelet count and MPV was each measured by the instrument routinely used in each institution. In some centres, platelet count was also measured by optical microscopy. MPD was evaluated centrally by image analysis of peripheral blood films. The previously identified cut-off value for MPV had 91% specificity in distinguishing ITP from inherited macrothrombocytopenias (mono and biallelic Bernard-Soulier, MYH9-related disease), while its sensitivity was greatly variable depending on the instrument used. With an appropriate instrument, specificity was 83%. The diagnostic accuracy of MPD was lower than that obtained with MPV. We concluded that MPV is a useful parameter for differentiating ITP from IT provided that it is measured by appropriate cell counters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available