4.6 Article

Tissue factor-positive monocytes in children with sickle cell disease: correlation with biomarkers of haemolysis

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 157, Issue 3, Pages 370-380

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2012.09065.x

Keywords

Sickle cell disease; tissue factor-positive monocytes; coagulation abnormalities; biomarkers of haemolysis; biomarkers of inflammation

Categories

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD [P60HL62148, U54HL70585]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tissue Factor (TF) initiates thrombin generation, and whole blood TF (WBTF) is elevated in sickle cell disease (SCD). We sought to identify the presence of TF-positive monocytes in SCD and their relationship with the other coagulation markers including WBTF, microparticle-associated TF, thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) complexes and D-dimer. Whether major SCD-related pathobiological processes, including haemolysis, inflammation and endothelial activation, contribute to the coagulation abnormalities was also studied. The cohort comprised children with SCD (18 HbSS, 12 HbSC, mean age 388100%6 years). We demonstrated elevated levels of TF-positive monocytes in HbSS, which correlated with WBTF, TAT and D-dimer (P = 0.02 to P = 0.0003). While TF-positive monocytes, WBTF, TAT and D-dimer correlated with several biomarkers of haemolysis, inflammation and endothelial activation in univariate analyses, in multiple regression models the haemolytic markers (reticulocytes and lactate dehydrogenase) contributed exclusively to the association with all four coagulant markers evaluated. The demonstration that haemolysis is the predominant operative pathology in the associated perturbations of coagulation in HbSS at a young age provides additional evidence for the early use of therapeutic agents, such as hydroxycarbamide to reduce the haemolytic component of this disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available