4.6 Article

Omission of in vivo T-cell depletion promotes rapid expansion of naive CD4+ cord blood lymphocytes and restores adaptive immunity within 2 months after unrelated cord blood transplant

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 156, Issue 5, Pages 656-666

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.08994.x

Keywords

immune reconstitution; CD4(+) T-cell lymphocytes; umbilical cord blood transplantation; paediatrics

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centres

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Umbilical cord blood transplant (UCBT) is associated with impaired early immune reconstitution. This might be explained by a lower T-cell dose infused, the naivety of cord blood T-cells and the use of in vivo T-cell depletion. We studied the pattern of early immune reconstitution and the clinical outcome of children undergoing unrelated UCBT when in vivo T-cell depletion was omitted. Thirty children affected by malignancies (46%) or immunodeficiencies (54%) underwent an unrelated UCBT. Prospective assessment of immune reconstitution and clinical outcome was performed. We observed an unprecedented CD4(+) T-cell reconstitution, with a median cell count at 30 and 60 d post UCBT of 0.3 x 10(9)/l and 0.56 x 10(9)/l, respectively. Early T-cell expansion was thymic-independent, with a rapid shift from naive to central memory phenotype and early regulatory T-cell recovery. Viral infections were frequent (63%) but resolved rapidly in most cases and virus-specific T-lymphocytes were detected within 2 months post-UCBT. Acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) was frequent (grade II = 34%, grade III-IV = 16%) but steroid responsive, and the incidence of chronic GvHD was low (14%). The omission of in vivo T-cell depletion promotes a unique thymic-independent CD4(+) T-cell reconstitution after unrelated UCBT in children. We postulate that this relates to the specific immunological and ontological qualities of fetal-derived lymphocytes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available