4.6 Article

Tanespimycin and bortezomib combination treatment in patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: results of a phase 1/2 study

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 153, Issue 6, Pages 729-740

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.08664.x

Keywords

tanespimycin; bortezomib; myeloma; heat shock protein 90; proteasome

Categories

Funding

  1. Bristol-Myers Squibb (Kosan Biosciences)
  2. Millennium Pharmaceuticals
  3. Celgene Corporation
  4. Novartis
  5. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  6. Gloucester Pharmaceuticals
  7. Facet Biotech
  8. Centocor Ortho Biotech Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

P>This open-label, dose escalation, multicentre phase 1/2 trial was undertaken to determine the safety and tolerability of the heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibitor tanespimycin (100-340 mg/m2) + bortezomib (0 center dot 7-1 center dot 3 mg/m2) given on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 in each 21-d cycle. Phase 2 expansion occurred at the highest tested dose of tanespimycin at 340 mg/m2 and bortezomib at 1 center dot 3 mg/m2. Seventy-two patients (median age, 60 years) with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM) were enrolled; 63 patients (89%) completed the study. Tanespimycin in combination with bortezomib was well tolerated; few patients experienced significant neutropenia, constipation and anorexia (< 10%), and no patients developed severe peripheral neuropathy. Among 67 efficacy-evaluable patients, there were 2 (3%) complete responses and 8 (12%) partial responses, for an objective response rate (ORR) of 27%, including 8 (12%) minimal responses. Response rates were highest among bortezomib-naive patients and proved durable in all patient subgroups, including those with bortezomib-refractory disease. Pharmacodynamic analyses indicated that tanespimycin plus bortezomib effectively inhibited the proteasome, as evidenced by decreased 20S proteasome activity, and inhibited HSP90, as reflected by increased HSP70 expression. The results of this study support additional studies of this combination approach in MM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available