4.6 Article

A pilot study of the short-term use of simvastatin in sickle cell disease: effects on markers of vascular dysfunction

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 153, Issue 5, Pages 655-663

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08480.x

Keywords

sickle cell disease; statin; nitric oxide; inflammation

Categories

Funding

  1. FDA Office of Orphan Products Development [1R01FD-03080-01-A1]
  2. National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) [UL1 RR024131-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

P>Sickle cell disease (SCD) is characterized by progressive vascular injury and its pathophysiology is strikingly similar to that of atherosclerosis. Statins decrease inflammation and improve endothelial function in cardiovascular disease, but their effect in SCD is not known. In this pilot study, we examined the safety and effect of short-term simvastatin on biomarkers of vascular dysfunction in SCD. We treated 26 SCD patients with simvastatin, 20 or 40 mg/d, for 21 d. Plasma nitric oxide metabolites (NOx), C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), tissue factor (TF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were analyzed and responses to simvastatin were compared between the two treatment groups. Simvastatin increased NOx levels by 23% in the low-dose (P = 0 center dot 01) and 106% in the moderate-dose (P = 0 center dot 01) groups, and by 52% overall (P = 0 center dot 0008). CRP decreased similarly in both dose groups and by 68% overall (P = 0 center dot 02). Levels of IL-6 decreased by 50% (P = 0 center dot 04) and 71% (P < 0 center dot 05) in the low- and moderate-dose groups, respectively. Simvastatin had no effect on VEGF, VCAM1 or TF. Simvastatin was well-tolerated and safe. Our preliminary findings showing a dose-related effect of simvastatin on levels of NOx, CRP and IL-6 suggest a potential therapeutic role for simvastatin in SCD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available