4.6 Article

VcR-CVAD induction chemotherapy followed by maintenance rituximab in mantle cell lymphoma: a Wisconsin Oncology Network study

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 155, Issue 2, Pages 190-197

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.08820.x

Keywords

bortezomib; chemotherapy; mantle cell lymphoma; non-Hodgkin lymphoma; rituximab

Categories

Funding

  1. University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, the Cancer Center Support [P30 CA14520]
  2. Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  3. University of Wisconsin
  4. National Institutes of Health [P30 CA14520]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intensive chemotherapy regimens are not feasible in many adults with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). We sought to build upon our previous experience with a non-intensive regimen, modified R-hyperCVAD chemotherapy (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, dexamethasone) with maintenance rituximab (MR), by the incorporation of bortezomib (VcR-CVAD) and the extension of MR beyond 2 years. Patients with previously untreated MCL received VcR-CVAD chemotherapy every 21 d for six cycles. Patients achieving at least a partial response to induction chemotherapy received rituximab consolidation (375 mg/m(2) x 4 weekly doses) and MR (375 mg/m(2) every 12 weeks x 20 doses). The primary end points were overall and complete response (CR), and secondary endpoints were progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Thirty patients were enrolled, with a median age of 61 years. All patients had advanced stage disease, and 60% had medium/high MCL International Prognostic Index risk factors. A CR or unconfirmed CR was achieved in 77% of patients. After a median follow-up of 42 months, the 3-year PFS and OS were 63% and 86%, respectively. The observed 3-year PFS and OS with VcR-CVAD in MCL were comparable to reported outcomes with more intensive regimens. A cooperative group trial (E1405) is attempting to replicate these promising results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available