4.6 Article

A pilot study evaluating the safety and CD34+ cell mobilizing activity of escalating doses of plerixafor in healthy volunteers

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 153, Issue 1, Pages 66-75

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08547.x

Keywords

stem cell mobilization; homing; plerixafor; CD34; BMT; clinical research

Categories

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute
  2. Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

P>This study evaluated the safety and CD34+ cell mobilizing activity of escalating doses of plerixafor in healthy volunteers. Three cohorts of six subjects received two different doses of plerixafor separated by at least 2 weeks to allow for adequate pharmacodynamic wash-out. The following dosing cohorts were evaluated: 0 center dot 24 and 0 center dot 32 mg/kg (Cohort 1); 0 center dot 32 and 0 center dot 40 mg/kg (Cohort 2); and 0 center dot 40 and 0 center dot 48 mg/kg (Cohort 3). Circulating CD34+ cells were measured 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 18 and 24 h after each dose. Blood colony-forming units were measured at baseline and 6 h after each dose. Common adverse events were diarrhoea, injection site erythema, perioral numbness, sinus tachycardia, headache, nausea, abdominal distention and injection site pain. No dose limiting toxicities occurred. When higher doses of plerixafor were administered, there was a trend towards higher peak CD34+ counts and CD34+ area under the curves, although these differences did not achieve statistical significance, perhaps due to intra-subject variability. Together, these data show that the higher doses of plerixafor evaluated in this study are reasonably safe and suggest that a larger study should be performed to definitively answer whether increased numbers of CD34+ cell are mobilized with higher doses of plerixafor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available