Journal
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages 462-467Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000231
Keywords
-
Funding
- Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) Research and Education Foundation's Educational Scholar grant
- GE Healthcare
- Siemens Healthcare
- Philips Healthcare
- Society of Thoracic Radiology
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Purpose To compare standard of care and reduced dose (RD) abdominal computed tomography (CT) images reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP), adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR), model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) techniques. Materials and Methods In an Institutional Review Board-approved, prospective clinical study, 28 patients (mean age 59 +/- 13 years ), undergoing clinically indicated routine abdominal CT on a 64-channel multi-detector CT scanner, gave written informed consent for acquisition of an additional RD (<1 milli-Sievert) abdomen CT series. Sinogram data of RD series were reconstructed with FBP, ASIR, and MBIR and compared with FBP images of standard dose abdomen CT. Two radiologists performed randomized, independent, and blinded comparison for lesion detection, lesion margin, visibility of normal structures, and diagnostic confidence. Results Mean CT dose index volume was 10 +/- 3.4 mGy and 1.3 +/- 0.3 mGy for standard and RD CT, respectively. There were 73 true positive lesions detected on standard of care CT. Nine lesions (<8 mm in size) were missed on RD abdominal CT images which included liver lesions, liver cysts, kidney cysts, and paracolonic abscess. These lesions were missed regardless of patient size and types of iterative reconstruction techniques used for reconstruction of RD data sets. The visibility of lesion margin was suboptimal in (23/28) patients with RD FBP, (15/28) patients with RD ASIR, and (14/28) patients with RD MBIR compared to standard of care FBP images (P < 0.001). Diagnostic confidence for the assessment of lesions on RD images was suboptimal in most patients regardless of iterative reconstruction techniques. Conclusions Clinically significant lesions (< 8 mm) can be missed on abdominal CT examinations acquired at a CT dose index volume of 1.3 mGy regardless of patients' size and reconstruction techniques (FBP, ASIR, and MBIR).
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available