4.2 Article

Dynamic Computed Tomographic Features of Adult Renal Cell Carcinoma Associated With Xp11.2 Translocation/TFE3 Gene Fusions: Comparison With Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages 730-736

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000263

Keywords

carcinoma; renal cell; adult; multidetector computed tomography; diagnosis; differential; in situ hybridization; fluorescence

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21377052]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20131281]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [20620140664]
  4. Nanjing City Young Health Personnel Training Project [QRX11178]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To investigate the dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) characteristics of renal cell carcinoma associated with Xp11.2 translocation and TFE gene fusion (Xp11.2 RCC) by comparison with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC). Methods Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT images and clinical and pathological records of 20 adult patients with Xp11.2 RCC confirmed by TFE3 immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization assay were retrospectively analyzed and compared with the findings of 21 contemporary CCRCCs. Results Renal cell carcinoma associated with Xp11.2 translocation and TFE gene fusions often occurred in young (30.6 8.6 years) patients with hematuria (9/20). They presented as well-defined (17/20) cystic-solid (17/20) mass with hemorrhage (8/20) and circular/rim calcifications (6/20). Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT showed heterogeneous moderate prolonged enhancement. A tumor-to-cortex attenuation ratio in corticomedullary phase less than 0.62 gave a sensitivity of 90.0% and a specificity of 92.9% in differentiating Xp11.2 RCC from CCRCC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.957, P < 0.001). Conclusions Computed tomographic characteristics and dynamic contrast-enhanced patterns and index can differentiate Xp11.2 RCC from CCRCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available