4.6 Article

Minimal residual disease is a significant predictor of treatment failure in non T-lineage adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: final results of the international trial UKALL XII/ECOG2993

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 148, Issue 1, Pages 80-89

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07941.x

Keywords

acute leukaemia; minimal residual disease; acute lymphoblastic leukaemia; stem cell transplantation; risk factors

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [MC_U137686856] Funding Source: Medline
  2. MRC [MC_U137686856] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

P>The predictive value of molecular minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring using polymerase chain reaction amplification of clone-specific immunoglobulin or T-cell Receptor rearrangements was analysed in 161 patients with non T-lineage Philadelphia-negative acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) participating in the UK arm of the international ALL trial UKALL XII/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 2993. MRD positivity (>= 10-4) in patients treated with chemotherapy alone was associated with significantly shorter relapse-free survival (RFS) at several time-points during the first year of therapy. MRD status best discriminated outcome after phase 2 induction, when the relative risk of relapse was 8 center dot 95 (2 center dot 85-28 center dot 09)-fold higher in MRD-positive (>= 10-4) patients and the 5-year RFS 15% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0-40%] compared to 71% (56-85%) in MRD-negative (< 10-4) patients (P = 0 center dot 0002) When MRD was detected prior to autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT), a significantly higher rate of treatment failure was observed [5-year RFS 25% (CI 0-55%) vs. 77% (95% CI 54-100%) in MRD-negative/< 10-4, P = 0 center dot 01] whereas in recipients of allogeneic-SCT in first complete remission, MRD positivity pre-transplant did not adversely affect outcome. These data provide a rationale for introducing MRD-based risk stratification in future studies for the delineation of those at significant risk of treatment failure in whom intensification of therapy should be evaluated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available