4.5 Article

Assessing interactions between the associations of common genetic susceptibility variants, reproductive history and body mass index with breast cancer risk in the breast cancer association consortium: a combined case-control study

Journal

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/bcr2797

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NHMRC [251533, 209057, 504711]
  2. National Breast Cancer Foundation
  3. Cancer Australia [628333]
  4. European Community [223175 (HEALTH-F2-2009-223175)]
  5. Red Tematica de Investigacion Cooperativa en Cancer
  6. Asociacion Espanola Contra Cancer
  7. Fondo de Investigacion Santiario [PI081583, PI081120]
  8. Cancer Research UK
  9. Breakthrough Breast Cancer
  10. NHS
  11. National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services, USA
  12. National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute [CA-58860, CA-92044]
  13. Lon V Smith Foundation [LVS-39420]
  14. United States National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH) [RFA-CA-06-503]
  15. Cancer Care Ontario [U01 CA69467]
  16. Northern California Cancer Center [U01 CA69417]
  17. University of Melbourne [U01 CA69638]
  18. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
  19. New South Wales Cancer Council
  20. Victorian Health Promotion Foundation (Australia)
  21. Victorian Breast Cancer Research Consortium
  22. Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health
  23. Kuopio University Hospital
  24. Vaasa Central Hospital
  25. Academy of Finland
  26. Finnish Cancer Foundation
  27. Yorkshire Cancer Research
  28. Breast Cancer Campaign
  29. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) Germany [01KW9975/5, 01KW9976/8, 01KW9977/0, 01KW0114]
  30. Robert Bosch Foundation of Medical Research, Stuttgart
  31. Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ) Heidelberg
  32. Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance (IPA), Bochum
  33. Department of Internal Medicine, Evangelische Kliniken Bonn gGmbH
  34. Johanniter Krankenhaus, Bonn, Germany
  35. European Union [LSHC-CT-2003-503297]
  36. Stichting tegen Kanker [232-2008]
  37. Deutsche Krebshilfe e. V. [70492, 70-2892-BR I]
  38. state of Baden-Wurttemberg through the Medical Faculty of the University of Ulm [P. 685]
  39. Queensland Cancer Fund
  40. Cancer Council of New South Wales
  41. Cancer Council of Victoria
  42. Cancer Council of Tasmania
  43. Cancer Council of South Australia
  44. Cancer Foundation of Western Australia
  45. U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command [DAMD17-01-1-0729]
  46. Cancer Council Tasmania
  47. Chief Physician Johan Boserup and Lise Boserup Fund
  48. Danish Medical Research Council
  49. Copenhagen University Hospital
  50. Herlev Hospital
  51. NIH [CA122340, CA116201]
  52. Hamburg Cancer Society
  53. German Cancer Research Center
  54. University Hospital of Erlangen
  55. Dr. Mildred Scheel Foundation of the Deutsche Krebshilfe
  56. Agency for Science, Technology and Research of Singapore (A*STAR)
  57. NIH
  58. Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation
  59. Cancer Research UK [11022, 10118, 11021] Funding Source: researchfish
  60. The Francis Crick Institute [10119, 10124] Funding Source: researchfish
  61. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [U01CA069467, ZIACP010126, U01CA069638, U01CA069417, R01CA122340, P50CA116201, U01CA058860, R01CA058860] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Several common breast cancer genetic susceptibility variants have recently been identified. We aimed to determine how these variants combine with a subset of other known risk factors to influence breast cancer risk in white women of European ancestry using case-control studies participating in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. Methods: We evaluated two-way interactions between each of age at menarche, ever having had a live birth, number of live births, age at first birth and body mass index (BMI) and each of 12 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (10q26-rs2981582 (FGFR2), 8q24-rs13281615, 11p15-rs3817198 (LSP1), 5q11-rs889312 (MAP3K1), 16q12-rs3803662 (TOX3), 2q35-rs13387042, 5p12-rs10941679 (MRPS30), 17q23-rs6504950 (COX11), 3p24-rs4973768 (SLC4A7), CASP8-rs17468277, TGFB1-rs1982073 and ESR1-rs3020314). Interactions were tested for by fitting logistic regression models including per-allele and linear trend main effects for SNPs and risk factors, respectively, and single-parameter interaction terms for linear departure from independent multiplicative effects. Results: These analyses were applied to data for up to 26,349 invasive breast cancer cases and up to 32,208 controls from 21 case-control studies. No statistical evidence of interaction was observed beyond that expected by chance. Analyses were repeated using data from 11 population-based studies, and results were very similar. Conclusions: The relative risks for breast cancer associated with the common susceptibility variants identified to date do not appear to vary across women with different reproductive histories or body mass index (BMI). The assumption of multiplicative combined effects for these established genetic and other risk factors in risk prediction models appears justified.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available