4.7 Article

Seasonal variations in carbon dioxide exchange in an alpine wetland meadow on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau

Journal

BIOGEOSCIENCES
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages 1207-1221

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/bg-7-1207-2010

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [30770419, 30500080]
  2. CAS action-plan for west development [KZCX2XB2_06, KSCX2-YW-Z-1020]
  3. National Key Technologies RT program [2006BACO1A02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Alpine wetland meadow could functions as a carbon sink due to it high soil organic content and low decomposition. However, the magnitude and dynamics of carbon stock in alpine wetland ecosystems are not well quantified Therefore, understanding how environmental variables affect the processes that regulate carbon fluxes in alpine wetland meadow on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau is critical. To address this issue, Gross Primary Production (GPP), Ecosystem Respiration (R-eco), and Net Ecosystem Exchange (NEE) were examined in an alpine wetland meadow using the eddy covariance method from October 2003 to December 2006 at the Haibei Research Station of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Seasonal patterns of GPP and R-eco were closely associated with leaf area index (LAI). The R-eco showed a positive exponential to soil temperature and relatively low R-eco occurred during the non-growing season after a rain event. This result is inconsistent with the result observed in alpine shrubland meadow. In total, annual GPP were estimated at 575.7, 682.9, and 630.97 g C m(-2) in 2004, 2005, and 2006, respectively. Meanwhile, the Rem were equal to 676.8, 726.4, 808.2 g C m(-2), and thus the NEE were 101.1, 44.0 and 173.2 g C m(-2). These results indicated that the alpine wetland meadow was a moderately source of carbon dioxide (CO2). The observed carbon dioxide fluxes in the alpine wetland meadow were higher than other alpine meadow such as Kobresia humilis meadow and shrubland meadow.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available