Journal
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
Volume 63, Issue 615, Pages E657-E668Publisher
ROYAL COLL GENERAL PRACTITIONERS
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X673667
Keywords
advance care planning; conversations; elderly; end of life care; frail; systematic review
Categories
Funding
- UK National Institute of Health and Research (NIHR) as an Academic Clinical Fellow in Primary Care
- NIHR CLAHRC (Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care) for Cambridgeshire
- Macmillan Cancer Support
- National Institute for Health Research [ACF-2012-14-016] Funding Source: researchfish
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background Recent years have seen marked improvements in end-of-life care, however concerns have been expressed that services are focused on the needs of patients with cancer. This review focuses on conversations about end-of-life care with frail and older people who have no main overriding diagnosis who are estimated to account for around 40% of deaths. Aim To investigate the attitudes of the public and healthcare professionals to advance care planning discussions with frail and older people. Design and setting Systematic literature review and narrative synthesis. Method Articles that related to frail or older individuals and either advance care plans or discussions on end-of-life care were included. Studies of specific conditions or that focused on prognosis, capacity, or resuscitation decisions were excluded. Results While a significant minority of frail older individuals would find them unwelcome, the majority would appreciate the chance to discuss end-of-life care, yet most do not have this opportunity. Attitudes to the timing of these discussions were variable, but most perceived the risk of leaving them too late. Most doctors believed it was their professional responsibility to initiate discussions, but felt limited by time pressures and the absence of a precipitating event. A wide range of barriers were identified including the reluctance of family members to discuss end-of-life care, the passive expectation that someone else would decide on an individual's behalf, and significant uncertainty concerning future illness and decline. Conclusion The marked disparity between the majority of older individuals who would like the opportunity to discuss their end-of-life care and the minority that currently have this opportunity raises important questions if the wishes of this large group in society are to be respected. The challenge is to find effective ways of encouraging dialogue and choice within the constraints of the current healthcare systems and personal circumstances.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available