3.8 Article

Update on the clinical development of cangrelor

Journal

EXPERT REVIEW OF CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPY
Volume 8, Issue 8, Pages 1069-1077

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1586/ERC.10.90

Keywords

acute coronary syndrome; antiplatelet therapy; cangrelor; P2Y(12)-receptor antagonist; platelet

Funding

  1. Honoraria/lectures: Bristol Myers Squibb
  2. SanofiAventis
  3. Eli Lilly and Company
  4. Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. Honoraria/advisory board: Bristol Myers Squibb
  5. Astra Zeneca
  6. Portola Pharmaceuticals
  7. Novartis
  8. Arena Pharmaceuticals
  9. GlaxoSmithKline
  10. Otsuka
  11. Accumetrics
  12. Medicines Company
  13. AstraZeneca
  14. Eisai
  15. Portola Pharmaceutical
  16. Schering-Plough
  17. Johnson and Johnson

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Antiplatelet drugs represent the cornerstone of treatment for cardiovascular atherothrombotic disease. Dual oral antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and oral ADP-receptor antagonists, such as clopidogrel, has been the standard choice for prevention of ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome and in those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. However, due to the limitations of clopidogrel, such as interindividual-response variability, drug-drug interactions, slow onset of action and irreversible inhibitory effects, novel antiplatelet agents are under clinical development. Cangrelor is a reversible, potent, competitive inhibitor of the ADP P2Y 12 receptor that is administered intravenously and rapidly achieves near complete inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation. These pharmacological properties make cangrelor a promising drug for clinical use. However, recent large-scale Phase III clinical investigations failed to show significant clinical benefit on the primary end point with cangrelor. This article provides an overview of the current status of knowledge on cangrelor, focusing on its pharmacologic properties and clinical development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available