4.4 Article

Continuing medical education and burnout among Danish GPs

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
Volume 58, Issue 546, Pages 15-19

Publisher

ROYAL COLL GENERAL PRACTITIONERS
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp08X263767

Keywords

burnout; continuing medical education; general practice; general practitioner

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background There has been minimal research into continuing medical education (CME) and its association with burnout among GPs. Aim The aim of this study was to investigate the association between participating in GME and experiencing burnout in a sample of Danish GPs. Design of study Cross-sectional questionnaire study. Setting All 458 active GPs in 2004, in the County of Aarhus, Denmark were invited to participate. Method Data on CME activities were obtained for all GPs and linked to burnout which was measured using the Maslach Burnout Inventory - Human Services Survey. The relationship between CME activity and burnout was calculated as prevalence ratios (PR) in a generalised linear model. Results In total, 379 (83.5%) GPs returned the questionnaire. The prevalence of burnout was about 25%, and almost 3% suffered from 'high burnout'. A total of 344 (92.0%) GPs were members of a CME group or a supervision group. Not being a member of either a CME group or a supervision group was statistically significantly associated with doubled likelihood of burnout (PR = 2.2). Among GPs not making use of a practice facilitator, a seven-fold higher likelihood of high burnout was found. Conclusion GPs who were not members of a CME group and did not take part in outreach visits had a higher likelihood of suffering from burnout and high burnout than those who were members of a CME group or received outreach visits. Therefore, not being a member of a CME group could indicate that the GP is more likely to suffer from burnout. Although the present study does not unequivocally establish causality, it would be interesting to see whether staying active in CME may also prevent burnout among GPs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available