4.6 Article

Overexpression of p300 correlates with poor prognosis in patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
Volume 172, Issue 1, Pages 111-119

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.13226

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundIt has been suggested that the p300 transcriptional coactivator participates in the regulation of a wide range of cell biological processes, and mutations in p300 have been identified in various cancers. ObjectivesTo investigate p300 expression in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) tissues and its effect on the outcome of patients with cSCC. MethodsImmunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on a tissue microarray to investigate p300 expression levels in cSCC tissues. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, Kaplan-Meier plots and a Cox proportional hazards regression model were used to analyse the data. ResultsBased on the ROC curves, we defined the cut-off score for high p300 expression as >55% of tumour cells positively stained. High expression of p300 was observed in 86 of 165 (521%) of the cSCC samples and six of 30 (20%) of the adjacent normal skin tissue samples (P<0001). High expression of p300 was positively correlated with lymph node metastasis (P=0006) and advanced clinical stage (P<0001). In univariate survival analysis, high expression of p300 was correlated with poor patient outcomes in terms of recurrence-free survival (P=0006) and overall survival (P<0001). Moreover, p300 expression was evaluated as an independent prognostic factor in a multivariate analysis (P=0004). ConclusionsOur results indicate that high p300 expression is associated with aggressive features of cSCC and suggest that p300 expression, as examined by IHC, will be a promising biomarker for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with cSCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available