4.6 Article

Histopathological analysis and clinical correlation of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS)

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
Volume 170, Issue 4, Pages 866-873

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.12783

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Council, Taiwan [98 2320 B 010 002-MY3, 98-2314-B-182A-027-MY3, NSC 101-2320-B-010-072-MY3, NSC 101-2321-B-010-027, NSC101-2628-B-182-001 MY3, NSC101 2321 B 182 008]
  2. Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a severe cutaneous adverse drug reaction. However, its histopathological features have not been well defined. Objectives To identify the clinicohistopathological findings of DRESS, and analyse the cutaneous histopathological changes observed in DRESS compared with those observed in maculopapular exanthema (MPE). Methods In a retrospective study, conducted at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (Taiwan) between 2001 and 2011, we compared the clinicohistopathological features of 32 patients with probable/definite DRESS (defined by the RegiSCAR scoring system) with those of 17 patients with MPE. Results The major pathological changes observed in patients with DRESS included dyskeratosis (97%), epidermal spongiosis (78%), interface vacuolization (91%), perivascular lymphocytic infiltration (97%) and eosinophilic infiltration (72%). Many pathological features were common to both MPE and DRESS. However, severe dyskeratosis, epidermal spongiosis and severe interface vacuolization were significantly more prominent in cases of DRESS (P < 0.05). The presence of severe dyskeratosis was significantly associated with the clinical severity of renal impairment (P = 0.01). Conclusions The severe dyskeratosis detected in patients with DRESS may correlate with a greater extent of systemic involvement compared with that noted in MPE. However, the histopathological changes associated with DRESS are not entirely specific.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available