4.5 Review

Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling in oncology: a tool for predicting clinical response

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 79, Issue 1, Pages 56-71

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.12258

Keywords

biomarkers; oncology; PKPD; population modelling; time-to-event; tumour

Funding

  1. Swedish Cancer Society
  2. DDMoRe which is an Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking [115156]
  3. European Union
  4. Genentech, Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In oncology trials, overall survival (OS) is considered the most reliable and preferred endpoint to evaluate the benefit of drug treatment. Other relevant variables are also collected from patients for a given drug and its indication, and it is important to characterize the dynamic effects and links between these variables in order to improve the speed and efficiency of clinical oncology drug development. However, the drug-induced effects and causal relationships are often difficult to interpret because of temporal differences. To address this, population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) modelling and parametric time-to-event (TTE) models are becoming more frequently applied. Population PKPD and TTE models allow for exploration towards describing the data, understanding the disease and drug action over time, investigating relevance of biomarkers, quantifying patient variability and in designing successful trials. In addition, development of models characterizing both desired and adverse effects in a modelling framework support exploration of risk-benefit of different dosing schedules. In this review, we have summarized population PKPD modelling analyses describing tumour, tumour marker and biomarker responses, as well as adverse effects, from anticancer drug treatment data. Various model-based metrics used to drive PD response and predict OS for oncology drugs and their indications are also discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available