4.4 Article

DOCK 6: Impact of New Features and Current Docking Performance

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 36, Issue 15, Pages 1132-1156

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.23905

Keywords

docking; pose reproduction; cross-docking; enrichment; virtual screening; ligand flexibility; DOCK

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [F32GM105400, F31CA134201, R01GM083669]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy/State of New York [DE-AC02-98CH10886]
  3. Stony Brook University Office of the Vice President for Research, the New York State Office of Science Technology and Academic Research (NYSTAR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This manuscript presents the latest algorithmic and methodological developments to the structure-based design program DOCK 6.7 focused on an updated internal energy function, new anchor selection control, enhanced minimization options, a footprint similarity scoring function, a symmetry-corrected root-mean-square deviation algorithm, a database filter, and docking forensic tools. An important strategy during development involved use of three orthogonal metrics for assessment and validation: pose reproduction over a large database of 1043 protein-ligand complexes (SB2012 test set), cross-docking to 24 drug-target protein families, and database enrichment using large active and decoy datasets (Directory of Useful Decoys [DUD]-E test set) for five important proteins including HIV protease and IGF-1R. Relative to earlier versions, a key outcome of the work is a significant increase in pose reproduction success in going from DOCK 4.0.2 (51.4%) 5.4 (65.2%) 6.7 (73.3%) as a result of significant decreases in failure arising from both sampling 24.1% 13.6% 9.1% and scoring 24.4% 21.1% 17.5%. Companion cross-docking and enrichment studies with the new version highlight other strengths and remaining areas for improvement, especially for systems containing metal ions. The source code for DOCK 6.7 is available for download and free for academic users at . (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available