4.7 Article

A phase II randomised (calibrated design) study on the activity of the single-agent trabectedin in metastatic or locally relapsed uterine leiomyosarcoma

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 119, Issue 5, Pages 565-571

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41416-018-0190-y

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. IRCCS Mario Negri Institute, Milan, Italy
  2. Pharma Mar

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Patients with recurrent/metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma (U-LMS) have a dismal prognosis. This phase II study aims to evaluate trabectedin efficacy and safety in advanced U-LMS. METHODS: Eligible patients had received >= one line of chemotherapy. Gemcitabine +/- docetaxel naive patients were randomised to Arm A: trabectedin 1.3 mg/m(2) or calibration Arm B: gemcitabine 900 mg/m(2) and docetaxel 75 mg/m(2). Patients who had already received gemcitabine +/- docetaxel directly entered Arm A. Primary end-point: 6-month progression-free rate (PFS-6). The null hypothesis that the true PFS-6 = 14% was tested against a one-sided alternative. This design yielded a 5% type I error rate and 90% power when the true PFS-6 is 25%. RESULTS: Overall, 126 patients entered Arm A (45 from randomisation and 81 directly) and 42 Arm B. Arm A patients characteristics: median age = 57; >= 2 previous chemotherapy lines = 37.4%; metastatic disease = 93%. The study met the condition for trabectedin activity: PFS-6 = 35.2% (95% CI: 26.2-45). No difference in PFS by the number of previous chemotherapy lines emerged. Median OS = 20.6 months (IQR: 8-36.4). In Arm B, the PFS-6 = 51.5% (95% CI: 33.5-69.2). No toxic deaths occurred. In Arm A, only 4 patients interrupted treatment for toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Trabectedin is active and well tolerated, retaining similar efficacy across one to three previous lines of chemotherapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available