4.7 Article

Lack of correlation of stem cell markers in breast cancer stem cells

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 110, Issue 8, Pages 2063-2071

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.105

Keywords

breast cancer stem cells; mammospheres; side-population; therapy resistance

Categories

Funding

  1. University of Dundee
  2. Breast Cancer Research Scotland
  3. European Regional Development Fund
  4. State Budget of the Czech Republic (RECAMO) [CZ.1.05/2.1.00/03.0101]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Various markers are used to identify the unique sub-population of breast cancer cells with stem cell properties. Whether these markers are expressed in all breast cancers, identify the same population of cells, or equate to therapeutic response is controversial. Methods: We investigated the expression of multiple cancer stem cell markers in human breast cancer samples and cell lines in vitro and in vivo, comparing across and within samples and relating expression with growth and therapeutic response to doxorubicin, docetaxol and radiotherapy. Results: CD24, CD44, ALDH and SOX2 expression, the ability to form mammospheres and side-population cells are variably present in human cancers and cell lines. Each marker identifies a unique rather than common population of cancer cells. In vivo, cells expressing these markers are not specifically localized to the presumptive stem cell niche at the tumour/stroma interface. Repeated therapy does not consistently enrich cells expressing these markers, although ER-negative cells accumulate. Conclusions: Commonly employed methods identify different cancer cell sub-populations with no consistent therapeutic implications, rather than a single population of cells. The relationships of breast cancer stem cells to clinical parameters will require identification of specific markers or panels for the individual cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available