4.7 Article

Association between smoking and deaths due to colorectal malignant carcinoma: a national population-based case-control study in China

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 110, Issue 5, Pages 1351-1358

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.9

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council
  2. Imperial Cancer Research Fund in Britain
  3. US National Institutes of Health
  4. Chinese Ministry of Health
  5. Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
  6. UICC International Cancer Technology Transfer Fellowship
  7. Federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health [NO2-CO-41101]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: This study explored the association between smoking and colorectal malignant carcinoma (CRC) in the Chinese population at the national level for the first time. Methods: In the China Nationwide Retrospective Mortality Survey conducted during 1989-1991, 12 942 CRC cases among 1 136 336 all-cause deaths aged >= 30 years were randomly assigned 25 884 control interviews from 325 255 surviving spouses of all-cause deaths across 103 urban and rural areas. Results: Compared with non-smokers, smoking significantly increased the risk of CRC-specific mortality by 9.8% (odds ratio (OR) = 1.098, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.046-1.153) adjusted for sex, age, and residence. There were significant dose-response relationships between smoking and CRC, such as smoking years, cigarettes smoked daily, and age at onset of smoking. Long-term heavy smokers aged >= 50 years with >= 30 smoking years and >= 20 cigarettes daily had an excess risk of CRC deaths of 30.2% (OR = 1.302, 95% CI = 1.214-1.397). The strongest association between these smoking variables, such as long-term heavy smokers (OR = 1.604, 95% CI = 1.341-1.919), and CRC was observed among rural men. Conclusions: Quitting smoking at any time would likely be beneficial to CRC prevention. Long-term heavy smokers and rural men should be viewed as special targets for smoking prevention and cessation programs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available