4.7 Article

Key differences identified between actinic keratosis and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma by transcriptome profiling

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 110, Issue 2, Pages 520-529

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.760

Keywords

cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma; MAPK pathway; actinic keratosis; expression microarray profiling; differentiation status; skin cancer

Categories

Funding

  1. Cancer Research UK
  2. European Research Council
  3. British Skin Foundation and Barts
  4. London Charitable Trust
  5. Cancer Research UK [13044] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is one of the most common malignancies in fair-skinned populations worldwide and its incidence is increasing. Despite previous observations of multiple genetic abnormalities in cSCC, the oncogenic process remains elusive. The purpose of this study was to elucidate key molecular events associated with progression from premalignant actinic keratoses (AKs) to invasive cSCC by transcriptome profiling. Methods: We combined laser capture microdissection with the Affymetrix HGU133 Plus 2.0 microarrays to profile 30 cSCC and 10 AKs. Results: We identified a core set of 196 genes that are differentially expressed between AK and cSCC, and are enriched for processes including epidermal differentiation, cell migration, cell-cycle regulation and metabolism. Gene set enrichment analysis highlighted a key role for the mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway in cSCC compared with AK. Furthermore, the histological subtype of the tumour was shown to influence the expression profile. Conclusion: These data indicate that the MAPK pathway may be pivotal to the transition from AK to cSCC, thus representing a potential target for cSCC prevention. In addition, transcriptome differences identified between cSCC subtypes have important implications for future development of targeted therapies for this malignancy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available