4.7 Article

Prognostic value of Ki-67 for prostate cancer death in a conservatively managed cohort

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 108, Issue 2, Pages 271-277

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.598

Keywords

localised prostate cancer; prognostic factors; Ki-67; needle biopsy

Categories

Funding

  1. Cancer Research UK
  2. Orchid Appeal
  3. National Institutes of Health (SPORE)
  4. Koch Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Standard clinical parameters cannot accurately differentiate indolent from aggressive prostate cancer. Our previous work showed that immunohistochemical (IHC) Ki-67 improved prediction of prostate cancer death in a cohort of conservatively treated clinically localised prostate cancers diagnosed by transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Here, we present results in a more clinically relevant needle biopsy cohort. Methods: Biopsy specimens were microarrayed. The percentage of Ki-67 positively stained malignant cells per core was measured and the maximum score per individual used in analysis of time to death from prostate cancer using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results: In univariate analysis (n = 293), the hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence intervals) for dichotomous Ki-67 (<= 10%, >10%) was 3.42 (1.76, 6.62) chi(2) (1 df) = 9.8, P = 0.002. In multivariate analysis, Ki-67 added significant predictive information to that provided by Gleason score and prostate-specific antigen (HR = 2.78 (1.42, 5.46), chi(2) (1 df) = 7.0, P = 0.008). Conclusion: The IHC Ki-67 scoring on prostate needle biopsies is practicable and yielded significant prognostic information. It was less informative than in the previous TURP cohort where tumour samples were larger and more comprehensive, but in more contemporary cohorts with larger numbers of biopsies per patient, Ki-67 may prove a more powerful biomarker.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available