4.7 Article

CD44 variant 9 expression in primary early gastric cancer as a predictive marker for recurrence

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 109, Issue 2, Pages 379-386

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.314

Keywords

gastric cancer; CD44 variant 9; cancer stem cell; recurrence; biomarker; endoscopic procedure

Categories

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [40570932, 22300169]
  2. Smoking Research Foundation
  3. Keio Gijuku Academic Development Fund
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24659103] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Multiple early gastric cancers (EGCs) may develop in 6-14% of patients even after achieving curative endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD); however, a useful biomarker for predicting recurrence is not available. The present study investigated whether the expression of CD44 variant 9 (CD44v9), a functional cancer stem cell marker, in the primary gastric cancer tissue represents an indicator of recurrence. Methods: Eighty-eight patients who underwent ESD for EGC from 2008 to 2010 were enrolled and monitored for recurrence for 3 years. The expression levels of CD44v9 in the tissue of initial EGCs were evaluated by immunohistochemistry, and the recurrence rate was compared between CD44v9-positive and CD44v9-negative groups. The mucin phenotype and expression of microRNA-21 (miR-21) and programmed cell death protein 4 (PDCD4) were also analysed. Results: The recurrence rate of EGC was significantly higher in the CD44v9-positive group than in the CD44v9-negative group (hazard ratio (HR), 21.8; 95% confidence interval (CI), 5.71-83.1). However, mucin phenotypes and the expression of miR-21 and PDCD4 did not predict recurrence after ESD. Meanwhile, grade of gastric atrophy was also identified as a significant marker of multiple recurrence (HR, 4.95; 95% CI, 1.30-18.8). Conclusion: CD44 variant 9 expression represents a potential predictive marker for recurrence in EGC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available