4.7 Article

Elevated preoperative neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio is associated with poor prognosis in soft-tissue sarcoma patients

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 108, Issue 8, Pages 1677-1683

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.135

Keywords

neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio; soft-tissue sarcoma; prognostic biomarker; tumour microenvironment

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Recent data indicate that tumour microenvironment, which is influenced by inflammatory cells, has a crucial role in cancer progression and clinical outcome of patients. In the present study, we investigated the prognostic relevance of preoperative neutrophil/lymphocyte (N/L) ratio on time to tumour recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS) in soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) patients who underwent curative surgical resection. Methods: In all, 260 STS patients were included in this retrospective study. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox proportional models were calculated for TTR and OS. Results: In univariate analysis, elevated N/L ratio was significantly associated with decreased TTR (hazard ratio (HR), 2.32; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.30-4.14; P=0.005) and remained significant in the multivariate analysis (HR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.05-3.71; P=0.035). Patients with elevated N/L ratio showed a median TTR of 77.9 months. In contrast, patients with low N/L ratio had a median TTR of 99.1 months. Regarding OS, elevated N/L ratio was also significantly associated with decreased survival in univariate analysis (HR, 2.90; 95% CI, 1.82-4.61; P=0.001) and remained significant in multivariate analysis (HR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.14-3.12; P=0.014). Conclusion: In conclusion, our findings suggest that an elevated preoperative N/L ratio predicts poor clinical outcome in STS patients and may serve as a cost-effective and broadly available independent prognostic biomarker.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available