4.7 Article

Randomised pilot study of dose escalation using conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: long-term follow-up

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 109, Issue 3, Pages 651-657

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.394

Keywords

prostate cancer; radiotherapy; dose escalation; phase III randomised controlled trial

Categories

Funding

  1. NHS Executive
  2. NHS
  3. Institute of Cancer Research (ICR)
  4. Cancer Research UK (CRUK) [C46/A3970, C1491/A9895]
  5. Cancer Research UK [15007, 10588, 15955] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0510-10096] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Radical three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (CFRT) with initial androgen suppression (AS) is a standard management for localised prostate cancer (PC). This pilot study evaluated the role of dose escalation and appropriate target volume margin. Here, we report long-term follow-up. Methods: Eligible patients had T1b-T3b N0 M0 PC. After neoadjuvant AS, they were randomised to CFRT, giving (a) 64 Gy with either a 1.0- or 1.5-cm margin and (b) +/- 10 Gy boost to the prostate alone. Results: One hundred and twenty-six men were randomised and treated. Median follow-up was 13.7 years. The median age was 66.6 years at randomisation. Median presenting prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 14 ng ml(-1). Sixty-four out of 126 patients developed PSA failure. Forty-nine out of 126 patients restarted AS, 34 out of 126 developed metastases and 28 out of 126 developed castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Fifty-one out of 126 patients died; 19 out of 51 died of PC. Median overall survival (OS) was 14.4 years. Although escalated dose results were favourable, no statistically significant differences were seen between the randomised groups; PSA control (hazard ratio (HR): 0.77 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.47-1.26)), development of CRPC (HR: 0.81 (95% CI: 0.40-1.65)), PC-specific survival (HR: 0.59 (95% CI: 0.23-1.49)) and OS (HR: 0.81 (95% CI: 0.47-1.40)). There was no evidence of a difference in PSA control according to margin size (HR: 1.01 (95% CI: 0.61-1.66)). Interpretation: Long-term follow-up of this small pilot study is compatible with a benefit from dose escalation, but confirmation from larger trials is required. There was no obvious detriment using the smaller radiotherapy margin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available