4.7 Article

Expression pattern of tumour-associated antigens in hepatocellular carcinoma: association with immune infiltration and disease progression

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 109, Issue 4, Pages 1031-1039

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.390

Keywords

tumour-associated antigen; immune infiltration; prognosis; hepatocellular carcinoma

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health of China [2012ZX10002-011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The distinct expression pattern of tumour-associated antigens (TAAs) might be a critical reason for the inefficacy of immunity-based treatments and heterogeneous postsurgical recovery in patients with solid tumours, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, little is known about the clinical value of the coexpression patterns of multiple TAAs. Methods: We determined the expression of multiple TAAs with identified immunogenicity (GPC3, AFP, SSX-2, NY-ESO-1, EpCAM, midkine) and the density of tumour-infiltrating immune cells by immunohistochemistry in a panel of 362 primary HCC patients. We evaluated the association between the TAAs, immune cell infiltration, clinicopathological parameters, and prognosis. Results: Patients who coexpressed more TAAs had better prognosis (P<0.00001, overall survival). The integrated pattern of TAA was associated with good differentiation and small tumour size, and with more CD57(+) natural killer and CD20(+) B-cell infiltration (P<0.05). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis identified the TAA index as an independent prognostic indicator (hazard ratio 0.625; 95% confidence interval 0.467-0.837; P = 0.002), and could further predict patient prognosis in collaboration with local immune infiltration. Conclusion: Our results could provide new evidence for the improvement of prognostic molecular signatures in HCC, and a novel rationale for patient enrolment in future immunotherapeutic trials and/or clinical treatments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available