Journal
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 108, Issue 9, Pages 1784-1789Publisher
NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.181
Keywords
prostate cancer; side effects; toxicity; health-related quality of life; prostatectomy; radiotherapy
Categories
Funding
- Dutch Cancer Society, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [2007-3809]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: Previous studies on the effects of different prostate cancer treatments on quality of life, were confounded because patients were not comparable. This study examined treatment effects in more comparable groups. Methods: From 2008-2011, 240 patients with localised prostate cancer were selected to be eligible for both radical prostatectomy (RP) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Brachytherapy (BT) was a third option for some. Health-related quality of life was measured by expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) up to 12 months after treatment. Results: In the sexual domain, RP led to worse summary scores (P < 0.001) and more often to a clinically relevant deterioration from baseline than BT and EBRT (79%, 33%, 34%, respectively). In the urinary domain, RP also led to worse summary scores (P = 0.014), and more deterioration from baseline (41%, 12%, 19%, respectively). Only on the irritative/obstructive urinary scale, more BT patients (40%) showed a relevant deterioration than RP (17%) and EBRT patients (11%). In the bowel domain, the treatment effects did not differ. Conclusion: This study provides a more unbiased comparison of treatment effects, as men were more comparable at baseline. Our results suggest that, for quality of life, radiotherapy is as least as good an option as RP for treating localised prostate cancer.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available