4.7 Article

miR-205 negatively regulates the androgen receptor and is associated with adverse outcome of prostate cancer patients

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 108, Issue 8, Pages 1668-1676

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.131

Keywords

miRNA; miR-205; prostate cancer; androgen receptor; CRPC; metastases

Categories

Funding

  1. European Union [201438]
  2. Swedish Research council
  3. Gunnar Nilssons Cancer foundation
  4. Jeanssons foundation
  5. Gyllenstiernska Krapperups foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The microRNA-205 (miR-205) has been shown to be deregulated in prostate cancer (PCa). Here we continue to investigate the prognostic and therapeutic potential of this microRNA. Methods: The expression of miR-205 is measured by qRT-PCR and in situ hybridisation in a well-documented PCa cohort. An AGO2-based RIP-Chip assay is used to identify targets that are verified with western blots, luciferase reporter assay, ELISA and immunohistochemistry. Results: The expression of miR-205 is inversely correlated to the occurrence of metastases and shortened overall survival, and is lower in castration-resistant PCa patients. The miR-205 expression is mainly localised to the basal cells of benign prostate tissues. Genes regulated by miR-205 are enriched in, for example, the MAPK/ERK, Toll-like receptor and IL-6 signaling pathways. We demonstrate binding of miR-205 to the 3'UTR of androgen receptor (AR) and decrease of both AR transcript and protein levels. This finding was corroborated in the patient cohort were miR-205 expression inversely correlated to AR immunostaining in malignant prostate cells and to serum levels of prostate-specific antigen, an androgen-regulated protein. Conclusion: Taken together, these findings imply that miR-205 might have therapeutic potential, especially for the castration resistant and currently untreatable form of PCa.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available