4.7 Article

Competing mortality in patients diagnosed with bladder cancer: evidence of undertreatment in the elderly and female patients

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 108, Issue 7, Pages 1534-1540

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.106

Keywords

urothelial; bladder; mortality; competing risk; elderly; female

Categories

Funding

  1. GSK Clinician Scientist fellowship
  2. Yorkshire Cancer Research, Sheffield Hospitals Charitable trust
  3. European Union (European Community) [FP7/2007-2013, HEALTH-F2-2007-201438]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Bladder cancer (BC) predominantly affects the elderly and is often the cause of death among patients with muscle-invasive disease. Clinicians lack quantitative estimates of competing mortality risks when considering treatments for BC. Our aim was to determine the bladder cancer-specific mortality (CSM) rate and other-cause mortality (OCM) rate for patients with newly diagnosed BC. Methods: Patients (n = 3281) identified from a population-based cancer registry diagnosed between 1994 and 2009. Median follow-up was 48.15 months (IQ range 18.1-98.7). Competing risk analysis was performed within patient groups and outcomes compared using Gray's test. Results: At 5 years after diagnosis, 1246 (40%) patients were dead: 617 (19%) from BC and 629 (19%) from other causes. The 5-year BC mortality rate varied between 1 and 59%, and OCM rate between 6 and 90%, depending primarily on the tumour type and patient age. Cancer-specific mortality was highest in the oldest patient groups. Few elderly patients received radical treatment for invasive cancer (52% vs 12% for patients <60 vs >80 years, respectively). Female patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive BC had worse CSM than equivalent males (Gray's P<0.01). Conclusion: Bladder CSM is highest among the elderly. Female patients with high-risk tumours are more likely to die of their disease compared with male patients. Clinicians should consider offering more aggressive treatment interventions among older patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available