4.7 Letter

Misunderstandings in the misconception on the use of pack-years in analysis of smoking

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Editorial Material Oncology

That the effects of smoking should be measured in pack-years: misconceptions 4

J. Peto

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER (2012)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Total Exposure and Exposure Rate Effects for Alcohol and Smoking and Risk of Head and Neck Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Case-Control Studies

Jay H. Lubin et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2009)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Cigarette smoking and cancer: Intensity patterns in the alpha-tocopherol, beta-carotene cancer prevention study in Finnish men

Jay H. Lubin et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2008)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Cigarette smoking and lung cancer - Modeling effect modification of total exposure and intensity

Jay H. Lubin et al.

EPIDEMIOLOGY (2007)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Evidence for an intensity-dependent interaction of NAT2 acetylation genotype and cigarette smoking in the Spanish Bladder Cancer Study

Jay H. Lubin et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2007)

Article Oncology

Cigarette smoking and lung cancer: Modeling total exposure and intensity

JH Lubin et al.

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION (2006)

Article Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology

Effects of N-acetyl transferase 1 and 2 polymorphisms on bladder cancer risk in Caucasians

J Gu et al.

MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS (2005)

Article Oncology

Smoking, DNA repair capacity and risk of nonsmall cell lung cancer

HB Shen et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER (2003)

Review Oncology

Smoking-related DNA and protein adducts in human tissues

DH Phillips

CARCINOGENESIS (2002)