4.7 Article

Dietary intake of meat, fruits, vegetables, and selective micronutrients and risk of bladder cancer in the New England region of the United States

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 106, Issue 11, Pages 1891-1898

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.187

Keywords

diet; micronutrients; bladder cancer

Categories

Funding

  1. Intramural Research Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Despite many studies on diet and bladder cancer, there are areas that remain unexplored including meat mutagens, specific vegetable groups, and vitamins from diet. METHODS: We conducted a population-based case-control study of bladder cancer in Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont. A total of 1171 cases were ascertained through hospital pathology records and cancer registries from 2001 to 2004. Overall, 1418 controls were identified from the Department of Motor Vehicles (< 65 years) and Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services (65-79 years) and were frequency-matched to cases by state, sex, and age (within 5 years). Diet was assessed with a self-administered Diet History Questionnaire. Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Processed meat intake was positively associated with bladder cancer (highest vs lowest quartile OR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.00-1.65; P-trend = 0.035), with a stronger association for processed red meat (OR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.08-1.84; P-trend = 0.024). There were no associations between intake of fruits or vegetables and bladder cancer. We did, however, observe an inverse association with vitamin B12 intake (OR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.61-0.99; P = 0.019). CONCLUSION: Vitamin B12 from diet may be protective against bladder cancer, whereas consuming processed meat may increase risk. British Journal of Cancer (2012) 106, 1891-1898. doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.187 www.bjcancer.com Published online 8 May 2012 (C) 2012 Cancer Research UK

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available