4.7 Article

Frequency of mutations in mismatch repair genes in a population-based study of women with ovarian cancer

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 107, Issue 10, Pages 1783-1790

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.452

Keywords

epithelial ovarian cancer; mismatch repair genes; MLH1; MSH2; MSH6; hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer

Categories

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [R01 CA111914, K07 CA108987, R01 CA063682, R01 CA063678, R01 CA080978]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Mutations in genes for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) in ovarian cancer patients remains poorly defined. We sought to estimate the frequency and characteristics of HNPCC gene mutations in a population-based sample of women with epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: The analysis included 1893 women with epithelial ovarian cancer ascertained from three population-based studies. Full-germline DNA sequencing of the coding regions was performed on three HNPCC genes, MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6. Collection of demographic, clinical and family history information was attempted in all women. RESULTS: Nine clearly pathogenic mutations were identified, including five in MSH6, two each in MLH1 and MSH2. In addition, 28 unique predicted pathogenic missense variants were identified in 55 patients. Pathogenic mutation carriers had an earlier mean age at diagnosis of ovarian cancer, overrepresentation of cancers with non-serous histologies and a higher number of relatives with HNPCC-related cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that fewer than 1% of women with ovarian cancer harbour a germline mutation in the HNPCC genes, with overrepresentation of MSH6 mutations. This represents a lower-range estimate due to the large number of predicted pathogenic variants in which pathogenicity could not definitively be determined. Identification of mismatch repair gene mutations has the potential to impact screening and treatment decisions in these women. British Journal of Cancer (2012) 107, 1783-1790. doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.452 www.bjcancer.com Published online 9 October 2012 (C) 2012 Cancer Research UK

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available