4.7 Article

Increased MET and HGF gene copy numbers are associated with trastuzumab failure in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 107, Issue 5, Pages 793-799

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.335

Keywords

breast cancer; HER2-positive; HGF; MET

Categories

Funding

  1. Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC) [IG9425]
  2. Associazione Oncologia Traslazionale (AOT)
  3. National Cancer Institute [P30-CA46934]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: To investigate whether copy number gain of MET or hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) affect trastuzumab sensitivity in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS: We analysed 130 HER2-positive MBC treated with trastuzumab-based therapy. MET and HGF gene copy numbers (GCN) were assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) in primary breast cancer samples. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was applied to find the best cutoff point for both MET and HGF GCN. RESULTS: MET FISH-positive cases (N = 36, mean >= 3.72) had a significantly higher trastuzumab failure rate (44.4% vs 16.0%; P = 0.001) and a significantly shorter time to progression (5.7 vs 9.9 months; HR 1.74; P = 0.006) than MET FISH-negative cases (N = 94, mean < 3.72). Hepatocyte growth factor GCN was evaluated in 84 cases (64.6%). Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified 33 HGF FISH-positive patients (mean HGF GCN >= 3.01). HGF FISH-positive status was significantly associated with higher risk of failure (30.3% vs 7.8%; P = 0.007) as compared with HGF FISH-negative cases (N = 51, mean < 3.01). MET and HGF FISH-positive status was highly correlated (P < 0.001) and combination of both biomarkers did not increase predictive value of either considered separately. CONCLUSION: High GCNs of MET and HGF associate with an increased risk of trastuzumab-based therapy failure in HER2-positive MBC. British Journal of Cancer (2012) 107, 793-799. doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.335 www.bjcancer.com Published online 31 July 2012 (C) 2012 Cancer Research UK

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available