4.7 Article

Macrophage migration inhibitory factor and DJ-1 in gastric cancer: differences between high-incidence and low-incidence areas

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 107, Issue 9, Pages 1595-1601

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.405

Keywords

MIF; DJ-1; geographical differences; gastric cancer

Categories

Funding

  1. University of Birmingham
  2. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.
  3. Birmingham Science City
  4. National Institute for Health Research [ACF-2009-09-011] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: There is a need for sensitive and specific blood-borne markers for the detection of gastric cancer. Raised serum macrophage inhibitory factor (MIF) levels have been proposed as a marker for gastric cancer diagnosis but, to date, studies have only encompassed patients from high-incidence areas. METHODS: We have compared the serum concentration of MIF in a large cohort of UK and Japanese gastric cancer patients, together with appropriate control subjects (age and gender matched). Carcinoembryonic antigen and H. pylori IgG were also measured, as was DJ-1, a novel candidate protein biomarker identified by analysis of gastric cancer cell line secretomes. RESULTS: Marked elevations of the serum concentration of MIF and DJ-1 were seen in Japanese patients with gastric cancer compared with Japanese controls, a trend not seen in the UK cohort. These results could not be accounted for by differences in age, disease stage or H. pylori status. CONCLUSION: In regions of high, but not low incidence of gastric cancer, both MIF and DJ-1 have elevated serum concentrations in gastric cancer patients, compared with controls. This suggests that differing mechanisms of disease pathogenesis may be at play in high-and low-incidence regions. British Journal of Cancer (2012) 107, 1595-1601. doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.405 www.bjcancer.com Published online 11 September 2012 (C) 2012 Cancer Research UK

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available