4.7 Article

Dynamic changes of live/apoptotic circulating tumour cells as predictive marker of response to Sunitinib in metastatic renal cancer

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 107, Issue 8, Pages 1286-1294

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.388

Keywords

renal cancer; circulating tumour cells (CTC); circulating endothelial cells (CEC); M30; sunitinib

Categories

Funding

  1. Banco Popolare di Verona
  2. Alleanza contro il cancro
  3. University of Padova, Progetto d'Ateneo
  4. Regione Veneto (Ricerca sanitaria finalizzata)
  5. AIRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Recently, we developed an apoptotic assay for expanding the monitoring capabilities of the circulating tumour cells (CTC) test during therapy. An automated platform for computing CTCs was integrated with a mAb (M30) targeting a neoepitope disclosed by caspase cleavage at cytokeratin 18 in early apoptosis; we showed that live CTCs were associated with progression, consistent with enhanced cell migration and invasion. The test was first applied here to mRCC. METHODS: Live/apoptotic CTCs changes were measured in mRCC patients receiving first-line Sunitinib and compared with circulating endothelial cell (CEC) levels. RESULTS: The presence of EpCAM-positive, live CTCs predicts progression in individual mRCC patient, being associated with distant metastasis under first-line Sunitinib. Synchronous detection of CTCs and CEC levels discloses for the first time an association between their dynamic changes and outcome: a rapid increase of the CEC number as early as the first cycle of therapy is associated with CTC decrease in non-progressed patients, whereas a delayed response of CECs is related to higher CTC values in the progressed group indicating treatment failure. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that a delayed response to antiangiogenic treatment indicated by persistent detection of CECs correlates with persistent live CTCs and more aggressive disease. British Journal of Cancer (2012) 107, 1286-1294. doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.388 www.bjcancer.com Published online 6 September 2012 (C) 2012 Cancer Research UK

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available